Presuposisi Kitab Kisah Para Rasul dalam Rancang Bangun Teologi Pentakosta

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v4i1.34

Keywords:

pentecostalism, The Acts, theology of pentecost, theological presupposition, Kisah Para Rasul, Pentakostalisme, presuposisi teologis, teologi Pentakosta

Abstract

The construction of the theology of Pentecost is very important in modern Pentecostalism movement, in order, at least, could reflecting this movement as a continuity of the prior one and giving responsible of a biblical foundation. This article purposed to show a logical foundation for using The Book of The Acts as biblically based on Pentecostalism movement. The author used a method of analyzing of the historical and philosophical essence of The Acts itself. And the conclusion is, that The Book of Acts has a theological presupposition, so that could be mostly used as a base for the theology of Pentecost.

Abstrak

Rancang bangun teologi Pentakosta merupakan hal yang sangat penting dalam gerakan Pentakostalisme modern, agar, setidaknya, dapat merefleksikan kegerakan ini sebagai sebuah kontinuitas dari yang telah ada jauh sebelumnya dan memiliki landasan biblikal yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan landasan yang logis penggunaan Kisah Para Rasul sebagai dasar kegerakan Pentakostalisme. Penulis menggunakan metode analisis historis-filosofis tentang esensi kitab Kisah Para Rasul itu sendiri. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan adalah, bahwa kitab Kisah Para Rasul memiliki presuposisi teologis, sehingga sangat fondasional jika menggunakannya sebagai dasar teologi Pentakosta.


References

Albrecht, Daniel E, and Evan B Howard. 12 Pentecostal Spirituality Part One: An Overview of Pentecostal Spirituality (2017): 235253.

Cartledge, Mark J. Pentecostal Theological Method and Intercultural Theology. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 25, no. 23 (April 2008): 92102. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026537880802500304.

Chan, Simon K H. EVIDENTIAL GLOSSOLALIA AND THE DOCTRINE OF SUBSEQUENCE. AJPS 22 (1999): 195211. Accessed November 1, 2017. http://www.apts.edu/aeimages//File/AJPS_PDF/99-2-schan.pdf.

Diester, Nico Syukur. Pengantar Teologi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1991.

Douglas, J. D., and F.F. Bruce. The New Bible Dictionary. England: IVP, 1980.

Fee, Gordon D. and Stuart, Douglas. How to Read The Bible for All Its Worth. Michigan: Academic Book, 1982.

Ford, David F ., Ben Quash Soskice, and Janet Martin. Fields Of Faith; Theology and Religious Studies for the Twenty-First Century. UK: Cambridge, 2005.

Goldingay, John. The Authority of The Old Testament. England: Apollos, n.d.

Green, Joel B. Memahami Injil-Injil Dan Kisah Para Rasul. Jakarta: Persekutan Pembaca Alkitab, 2005.

Green, Joel B., Scot McKnight, and I. Howard Marshall. Dictionary of the Jesus and the Gospels. England: IVP, 1992.

Hardy, Donald E. Narrating Knowledge: Presupposition and Background in Flannery OConnors Fiction. Language and Literature 6, no. 1 (February 13, 1997): 2941. Accessed April 6, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096394709700600102.

Harrington, Luke Timothy Johnson and Daniel J. The Acts of the Apostles. Minnesota: The Liturgical Press, 1992.

Howell, Brian. Practical Belief and the Localization of Christianity: Pentecostal and Denominational Christianity in Global/local Perspective. Religion 33, no. 3 (2003): 233248.

Lie, Heryanto David, and Heryanto David Lie. Penggenapan Progresif Misi Allah Dalam Kisah Para Rasul 1:8. Jurnal Jaffray 15, no. 1 (March 14, 2017): 63. Accessed July 27, 2017. http://ojs.sttjaffray.ac.id/index.php/JJV71/article/view/235.

Morris, Henry M. Doctor Luke. http://www.icr.org/article/480/.

Morris, Leon. Teologi Perjanjian Baru. Malang: Gandum Mas, 1996.

Phan, Peter C. Whose Experiences? Whose Interpretations? Contribution of Asian Theologies to Theological Epistemology. Irish Theological Quarterly 71, no. 12 (February 24, 2006): 528. Accessed April 6, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021140006072559.

Phillips, Thomas E. The Genre of Acts: Moving Toward a Consensus? Currents in Research 4, no. 3 (June 3, 2006): 365396. Accessed April 6, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1476993X06064629.

Samuel Byrskog. Story as History: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.

Saunders, Daniel J. A Definition of Scientific Apologetics. Theological Studies 5, no. 2 (May 4, 1944): 159183. Accessed April 6, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004056394400500203.

Siahaan, Evan. MEMAHAMI PENTAKOSTALISME MELALUI BINGKAI HISTORIOGRAFI LUKAS DALAM KISAH PARA RASUL. Jurnal Antusias 4, no. 7 (June 12, 2015): 6081. Accessed October 29, 2017. http://www.sttintheos.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/antusias/article/view/6/5.

Soulen, R. Kendall. The Believer and the Historian. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 57, no. 2 (April 8, 2003): 174186. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002096430005700206.

Wiryadinata, Halim. An Evaluation Of Liberation Theology in The Light Of Its Praxis. KURIOS (Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen) 1, no. 1 (2013): 110.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-11

How to Cite

Siahaan, Harls Evan R. 2018. “Presuposisi Kitab Kisah Para Rasul Dalam Rancang Bangun Teologi Pentakosta”. KURIOS (Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen) 4 (1):56-73. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v4i1.34.

Issue

Section

Articles