Rereading qahal as Deuteronomist history works: Literal and ideological criticism approach

Authors

  • Pieter Anggiat Napitupulu Sekolah Tinggi Teologi STAPIN, Majalengka
  • Agus Santoso Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Reformed Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Bobby Kurnia Putrawan Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah, Tangerang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-7883

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v8i1.287

Keywords:

Deuteronomist, ideological criticism, literary criticism, Martin Noth, qahal

Abstract

Some biblical scholars understand Deuteronomy to be the end of the Pentateuch. Before the nation of Israel became a confederate system, the socio-political reality could usually be seen in the composition, interaction, and behavior of relationships in society, which were assumed to be political elements. The Israeli confederation which is like the ambition centered on Yahweh is what the author refers to as Israel's "Qahal". Martin Noth explains Qahal Israel in Deuteronomist Historical Works, which began with a period of wandering under the leadership of Musa, then became an immigrant in the Land of Canaan, followed by Saul's leadership where Israel asked the king to directly lead the Israelites. In the leadership of David and Solomon, which originally had 12 tribes, eventually split into two nations. With this monarchical system, God hates, because he does not reject God as the government in their life. The purpose of this study was to find the location of the Deuteronomy and Eating Qahal books in the book of laws. The research method uses critical research with a study of literature and ideological sources using Martin Noth's theory which is an early thesis in Deuteronomic History Works. The novelty of this research is the existence of a new meaning where the main message of Deuteronomic history works, namely Israel is forced to turn to God, confess His sins, and return to submit and obey His word because they have been chosen to be God's people (2 Ki 17:13).

References

Alva, Reginald. "The Spirit⬐led Church: Mission in Action in the Contemporary World." International Review of Mission. Vol.108, Iss.1 (2019): 164-177. DOI: 10.1111/irom.12270.

Bergen, David A. The Heart of the (Deuteronomic) Matter: Solomon and the book of the Law, Journal of Studies in Religion, Vol.35, Iss.2 (2006): 213-230. DOI: 10.1177/000842980603500202.

Gottwald, Norman. The Tribes of Yahweh. New York: Orbis Books, 1975.

Leeuwen, Arend Th. Van Agama Kristen Dalam Sejarah Dunia. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 1997.

Knoppers, Gary N., Greer, Jonathan S., Deuteronomistic History, Oxford Bibliographies (2010). DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195393361-0028.

Noth, Martin. The Deuteronomistic History, JSOT Supplement, Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Pr, 2002.

O??"Brien, Mark A. The Deuteronomistic History Hypothesis: A Reassessment. Freiburg, Switzerland / Göttingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag / Vandenhoeck Ruprecht, 1989, DOI: 10.5167/uzh-152171.

Pakkala, Juha. The Monotheism of the Deuteronomistic History, Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Vol.21, No.2 (2007): 159-178. DOI: 10.1080/09018320801896500.

Peterson, Brian Neil. ??SThe Deuteronomistic History since Martin Noth." In The Authors of the Deuteronomistic History: Locating a Tradition in Ancient Israel, Minneapolis: 1517 Media, 2014, 7-36. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt9m0v1j.5.

Peterson, Cheryl M. "Who is the Church?." A Journal of Theology Dialog, Vol.51, Iss.1 (2012): 24-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6385.2011.00651.x.

Radjawane, A. N. The Deuteronomic History. Ambon: PPsTAK UKI Maluku, 2011.

Römer, Thomas C. The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences. Humanities, Vol.46 (2015): 43-66.

Santoso, Agus. "Perceraian dalam Tradisi Tawarikh dan Tandingannya." Ed. Robert Setio, Daniel K. Listijabudi. Perceraian Di Persimpangan Jalan: Menelisik Perjanjian Lama dan Tradisi Abrahamik, Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2015.

Santoso, Agus. Tafsir Alkitab Kontekstual-Oikumenis: 1 Tawarikh, Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2017.

Sirait, Saut. Politik Kristen di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2012.

Th. C, Vriezen. Agama Israel Kuno. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2016.

Thembhani, Babane Morris. "Church Interpreting: Its Sociolinguistic Challenges in Some Vatsonga Charismatic Churches." Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.47, Iss.2 (2016): 111-118. DOI: 10.1080/09718923.2016.11893550.

Tim Penyusun. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2001.

Weber, Max. Ancient Judaism. llionis: The Free Press, 1952.

Williams, W. H. A Look Within the Deuteronomic History. Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol.25, Iss.3 (1972): 337-345. DOI: 10.1017/S0036930600028283.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Napitupulu, Pieter Anggiat, Agus Santoso, and Bobby Kurnia Putrawan. 2022. “Rereading Qahal As Deuteronomist History Works: Literal and Ideological Criticism Approach”. KURIOS 8 (1):163-74. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v8i1.287.

Issue

Section

Articles