Cara pandang hierarkis dan logika dominasi sebagai akar penyebab ketidakadilan gender dan kerusakan alam: Sebuah kritik teologi ekofeminis Kristen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v10i2.979Keywords:
androcentrism; ecological destruction; ecofeminist theology; gender injustice; logic of domination; androsentrisme; kerusakan alam; ketidakadilan gender; logika dominasi; teologi ekofeminisAbstract
In a world that is still constrained by oppression, discrimination, and violence against others, this article attempts to critically examine the hierarchical worldview and the logic of domination using a Christian ecofeminist theological perspective. This article aims to provide critical notes on several theological views that inherit or contribute to perpetuating hierarchical worldview, the logic of domination, and asymmetrical relationships, especially those that have become the basis for the oppression of women and nature. This study uses text analysis methods within the framework of a qualitative literature study to analyze and outline the core ideas of the logic of domination and the main theses of Christian ecofeminist theology to overcome the common exclusive and discriminatory theological problems. This research concludes that a hierarchical worldview and the logic of domination have become the root causes of various asymmetric exploitative relationships that have given rise to gender inequality, environmental destruction, and various other structural injustices in the world. This article encourages the emergence of collective awareness to fight for the social and ecological transformation of exploitative life structures.
Abstrak
Dalam dunia yang masih terkekang oleh penindasan, diskriminasi, dan kekerasan terhadap yang lain, artikel ini mengkaji secara kritis pandangan dunia hierarkis dan logika dominasi dengan menggunakan perspektif teologis ekofeminis Kristen. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan catatan kritis atas beberapa pandangan teologis yang mewarisi ataupun ikut melanggengkan cara pandang yang hierarkis, logika dominasi, dan relasi yang asimetris dalam kehidupan bersama, teristimewa yang telah menjadi dasar penindasan terhadap perempuan dan alam. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis teks dalam bingkai studi kualitatif literatur, menguraikan ide-ide inti logika dominasi yang melahirkan pandangan teologi yang eksklusif dan diskriminatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pandangan dunia hierarkis dan logika dominasi telah menjadi akar penyebab utama dari berbagai hubungan eksploitatif asimetris yang telah melahirkan ketidaksetaraan gender, perusakan lingkungan hidup, dan berbagai ketidakadilan struktural lainnya di dunia. Riset ini mendorong lahirnya kesadaran kolektif untuk memperjuangan transformasi sosial dan ekologis dari struktur-struktur kehidupan eksploitatif yang ada.
References
Adams, Carol J. (ed.), Ecofeminism and the Sacred. New York: Continuum, 1993.
Ampa, Andi Tenri. “Dampak Kerusakan Lingkungan terhadap Perempuan dan Anak.” Egalita Vol 5, No. 2, 2010: 7.
Daly, Mary. Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation. Boston: Beacon, 1973.
d’Eaubonne, Françoise. Le Feminism ou La Mort. Paris: Pierre Horay, 1984.
Doubiago, Sharon. "Mama Coyote Talks to the Boys," in J. Plant (ed.) Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1989.
Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler. Wisdom Ways: Introducing Feminist Biblical Interpretation. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 2001.
Fox, Warwick. ‘The Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate and Its Parallels,’ Environmental Ethics 11, 1:5-25.
Fransiskus, Paus. Evangelii Gaudium: The Joy of the Gospel. Vatican City: Vatican Press, 2013.
Gaut, Willy. “Feminisasi Perdagangan Manusia (Masalah Perdagangan Manusia dalam Konteks Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan).” Jurnal Ledalero Vol. 13, No. 1 (2014): 65-78.
Griffin, Susan. Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
Johnson, Elizabeth A. She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse. New York: Crossroad, 1992.
King, Ynestra. “Healing the Wounds: Feminism, Ecology, and the Nature/Culture Dualism,” in I. Diamond and G. F. Orenstein (eds) Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1990.
McFague, Sallie. Metaphorical Theology: Models of God in Religious Language. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982.
______________. The Body of God: An Ecological Theology (Minneapolis 1993)
Mesle, Robert C. Process Theology: A Basic Introduction. St. Louis, Missouri: Chalice Press, 1993.
Naess, Arne. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle, translated and edited by David Rothenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Ruether, Rosemary Radford. Gaia and God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing. San Francisco 1992.
Ohoiwutun, Barnabas. Posisi dan Peran Manusia dalam Alam Menurut Deep Ecology Arne Naess. (Tanggapan atas Kritik Al Gore). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PT Kanisius, 2020.
______________. “Kedudukan dan Peran Manusia dalam Alam: Tanggapan atas Kritik Al Gore terhadap Arne Naess.” Jurnal Ledalero Vol. 20, No. 1, Juni 2021: 67-81.
_____________. Laudato Si: On Care for Our Common Home. Vatican City: Vatican Press, 2015.
Rakoczy, Susan. “The Theological Vision of Elizabeth A Johnson.” Scriptura. Vol. 98 (2008): 137-155.
Shiva, Vandana. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. London: Zed Books, 1988.
Seibert, Eric A. The Violence of Scripture. Overcoming the Old Testament’s Troubling Legacy. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012.
Thomas of Celano, ‘The Life of Saint Francis’, I, 29, 81: in Francis of Assisi: Early Documents, Vol. 1. New York-London-Manila, 1999.
Warren, Karen J. (ed.), Ecological Feminism. London and New York: Routledge,1994.
_____________. “The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism,” Environmental Ethics 12, 2: 125-146.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
