Religious and sustainability: Studi integrasi antara pentakostalisme, populisme, dan politik

Authors

  • Pontus Sitorus Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Amsal
  • Jonias Pasaribu Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Amsal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v10i1.487

Keywords:

pentecostal, pentecostalism, populism, pentecostal politic, sustainable development goals (SDGs), pentakostal, pentakostalisme, populisme, politik pentakostal

Abstract

As part of the world community, Pentecostals must consider their role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This role must be carried out in various aspects, including socio-political with a populism approach to unify the identity of Pentecostalism. This research integrates Pentecostalism, politics, and populism to achieve sustainable development. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a constructive theological approach. The research results show that Pentecostalism populism in politics has a cheerful face in efforts to achieve sustainability. The universalism of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) must be combined with a more internal view and involve the Pentecostal community in the struggle for hegemony over the concept of sustainable development. Populism, which often mobilizes support through emotional issues and religious identity, can be integrated with sustainability strategies through religious communities providing spiritual and moral support. Integration between Pentecostalism, populism, and politics to achieve effective and inclusive sustainable development while recognizing the challenges and need for adaptation in the face of global social, political, and economic change.

 

Abstrak

Pentakostal sebagai bagian dalam masyarakat dunia ditantang untuk memikirkan peranannya dalam mencapai tujuan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Peranan tersebut mesti dilakukan dalam berbagai aspek, termasuk sosial-politik dengan pendekatan populisme sebagai sarana pemersatu identitas Pentakostalisme. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengintegrasikan antara Pentakostalisme, politik, dan populis sebagai sarana untuk mencapai pembangunan berkelanjutan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan teologi konstruktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa populisme Pentakostalisme dalam politik berwajah positif dalam upaya mencapai sustainability. Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan PBB harus dipadukan dengan pandangan yang lebih internal dan melibatkan komunitas Pentakostal dalam perjuangan mendukung dan menolak hegemoni atas konsep pembangunan berkelanjutan. Populisme, yang seringkali memobilisasi dukungan melalui isu-isu emosional dan identitas religius, dapat diintegrasikan dengan strategi keberlanjutan melalui komunitas agama yang menyediakan dukungan spiritual dan moral. Integrasi antara Pentakostalisme, populisme, dan politik sebagai sarana untuk mencapai pembangunan berkelanjutan yang efektif dan inklusif, sambil mengakui tantangan dan kebutuhan adaptasi dalam menghadapi perubahan sosial, politik, dan ekonomi global.

References

Adon, Mathias Jebaru. “Melawan Populisme Dengan Semangat Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Persatuan Dan Kesatuan Bangsa.†Jurnal Politik, Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2021.

Anderson, Allan Heaton. “Pentecostalism and Social, Political, and Economic Development.†Spiritus 5, no. 1 (2020): 121–36.

———. “The Emergence of a Multidimensional Global Missionary Movement: A Historical Review.†In Pentecostal Mission and Global Christianity, edited by Wonsuk Ma, Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen, and J. Kwabena Asamoah-Gyadu, 10–25. Oxford: Regnum Books International, 2014.

Brown, Trent. “Sustainability as Empty Signifier: Its Rise, Fall, and Radical Potential.†Antipode 48, no. 1 (2016): 115–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12164.

Comaroff, Jean. Pentecostalism, Populism and the Politics of Affect: In Africa and Elsewhere. Edited by Dena Freeman. Pentecostalism and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017253.

Duncan, Kent. “Emerging Engagement: The Growing Social Conscience of Pentecostalism.†Encounter: Journal for Pentecostal Ministry 7 (2010).

Flowe, J. Roswell. “Pentecostal Commission.†Pentecostal Evangel, June 1920.

Fontana, Leandro L.B., and Markus Luber, eds. Political Pentacostalism: Four Synoptic Survey from Asia, Africa, and America Latin. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 2021.

Fresteon, Paul. “Pentecostals and Politics in Latin America.†In Pentecostalisme and Politics, 2006.

Freston, Paul. “Pentecostalism and Global Politics: Three Questionable Approaches.†Intitute of Culture, Religion and World Affairs, 2014, 1–4.

Haight, Roger. “The Mission of the Church in the Theology of the Social Gospel.†Theological StudiesStudies 49, no. 3 (1988): 477–497.

Haustein, Jörg, and Emma Tomalin. “Religion, Populism, and the Politics of the Sustainable Development Goals.†Social Policy and Society 20, no. 2 (2021): 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474642000072X.

Herianto, Hubertus, and Robertus Wijanarko. “Populisme Berwajah Politik Identitas Keagamaan Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2022): 53–64.

Idahosa, B. I Choose to Change. Crowborough: Highland, 1987.

Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti. “The Pentecostal Understanding of Mission.†In Pentecostal Mission and Global Christianity, edited by Wonsuk Ma, Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen, and J. Kwabena Asamoah-Gyadu, 26–44. Oxford: Regnum Books International, 2014.

Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politic. London: Verso, 1987.

Miller, Donald E., and Tetsunao Yamamori. Pentecostalism Global: The New Face of Christian Social Engagement. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2016.

Pakpahan, Gernaida Krisna R. “Pentecostal Spiritual Formation: The Passion of Social for Humanity in Society 5.0 Era.†In Iconthce 2022, 2022:144–54. Atlantis Press SARL, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-160-9_17.

Pranoto, Minggus M. “Discering the Spirit (s) Dalam Kuasa Politik: Sebuah Perspektif Teologi Pentakostal.†Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Musik Gereja 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–16.

Smith, David L. A Handbook of Contemporary Theology. Michigan: Bridge Point Books, 1998.

Supatra, Hendarto. “Mengenal Pentakostalisme Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, Dan Musik Gereja 3, no. 2 (2019): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v3i2.97.

Vlas, Natalia, and Simona Sav. “Pentecostalism and Politics.†Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 13, no. 37 (2014): 148–77.

Welak, Feridus. “Populisme Di Indonesia: Ancaman Bagi Integritas Masyarakat Dan Reaktualisasi Pancasila.†Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 2, no. 1 (2022): 62–70.

Widjaja, Fransiskus Irwan, Harls Evan R. Siahaan, and Nathanael Octavianus. “Partisipasi Sosial-Politik Sebagai Praktik Hospitalitas Kaum Pentakostal.†DUNAMIS: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristiani 6, no. 1 (2021): 378–96. https://doi.org/10.30648/dun.v6i1.633.

Wijanarko, Robertus. “Religious Populism and Public Sphere in Indonesia.†Jurnal Sosial Humaniora (JSH), 2021.

Woodbridge, Michael. “From MDGs to SDGs: What Are the Sustainable Development Goals?†ICLEI BRIEFING SHEET - Urban Issues 1, no. 1 (2015): 4. https://www.local2030.org/library/251/From-MDGs-to-SDGs-What-are-the-Sustainable-Development-Goals.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-23

How to Cite

Sitorus, Pontus, and Jonias Pasaribu. 2024. “Religious and Sustainability: Studi Integrasi Antara Pentakostalisme, Populisme, Dan Politik”. KURIOS 10 (1):77-91. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v10i1.487.

Issue

Section

Articles